Monday, 7 October 2013

My findings from studying interactive narratives


Upon looking at the three interactive narratives, I’m starting to think the way that information is structured help highlight a sequential development of a message/argument. This has been achieved by organising the argument into sequential steps or into 3 case study categories and presenting those in a sliding like layout. This leads me on to think “How does structuring information help communication effectiveness?”

I want to look at different approaches/methods to visual thinking. E.g. mind-maps, flowcharts etc. These can be used as vehicle to present narratives.

Different layers of narratives

This is a list of the layer of meanings that a narrative can provide directly or indirectly.
  • Surface meaning
  • Ethical/moral meaning
  • Political/religious meaning 
  • Cautionary warning

Different interactive elements that can be used on a website

  • Photography/images; visual storytelling
  • Filmic material; documentary based storytelling
  • Comic; panel based storytelling
  • Moving slideshow with audio commentary
  • Film credits; a series of slides with typography

Purpose of a narrative

  • So far, the narratives I have been looking at aims to: Present a view about a social issue of some kind
  • Inform/persuade/engage the audience
  • Challenge perceptions, stereotypes, and misconceptions

A narrative I could choose to work with for my artefact could be about communism. This would work well because it is a complex message with multiple interpretations that allow the user to construct their own perspective about the issue.